Posted by Ben on 5/31/2009 07:25:00 PM

Ever thought about anger management classes?


Ever since training camp begins in October, our minds are focused on this time of year. Besides graduation and the thought of summer vacation, we always look forward to the NBA Finals. This is the time of year when the pundits no longer define the predictions, but rather, the predictions define the pundits. This is when one NBA franchise seizes the opportunity to rise to the top, and one team has to settle for silver. This is when one winner will be the example for future generations and the loser only a distant memory in the mind of the average fan. This is when a band of athletes representing two cities look to build a lasting reputation. This is where amazing happens.

This year the quest for gold is between the Los Angeles Lakers and Orlando Magic. If you had asked most fans at the beginning of the year, they would have told you the Lakers would definitely make the NBA Finals. If you had asked most fans during the season, they would have told you the Lakers would be 1 of 2 lone survivors come June. If you asked most fans during the first round of the playoffs, they probably would have told you the Lakers would emerge as the alpha-dog of the Western Conference and move on to the main stage. But if you asked most fans during the semifinals or finals of the Western Conference playoffs, they may have expressed some doubt about the Lakers winning the NBA championship, let alone staying in the race until June.

On the other hand, not many people would have told you that the Magic had the ability to defeat the Cleveland Cavaliers, otherwise known as "The Lebron James Show", and contend for 1st place. They could've brought up a number of excuses: The Magic doesn't have the experience. Jameer Nelson is injured. Van Gundy isn't the right coach. LBJ and the Cleveland Crew will surely beat them. Well, the Orlando Magic have come a long way. Dwight Howard proved that in a defense vs. offense showdown, the Defensive Player of the Year has the edge against the offensive-minded MVP. I thought the Lakers were getting too much hate. Turns out, the Magic weren't getting any love. Even after going 6-3 this season against Boston, the Lakers, and Cleveland, the blue-and-white bunch weren't getting any credit.

Let's not forget about the league, though. This is not the best situation for the NBA, who was ready to settle the "who's best" debacle by letting LBJ and KB play it out - which would have meant historically high ratings. Just think of all the time that was spent making the Kobe-Lebron puppet commercials. It would have been the match-up of a lifetime: Cleveland vs. Los Angeles, Kobe vs. Lebron, 24 vs. 23, Past vs. Future, Experience vs. Hype (in this case, I'm not rooting for hype). Take a second to ponder how much could have been written about such a series. Thousands of columns, hours of TV, and plenty of books would have been devoted solely to the 2008-2009 NBA Finals.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

However, let's not forget the storyline we're working with here. We still have the Lakers, who are desperately looking to redeem themselves after last year's embarrassment against the Celtics. A championship now would allow Phil Jackson to stand on a pedestal of his own - without the presence of Red Aurebach. A title would also prove that Kobe could win without Shaq, although big men have been influential in this pusuit (see: Pau Gasol). Statistically, if the Lakers won, they would have a 50% success rate in the Finals (15 championships in 30 appearances). Then, there's a young group based near Disneyworld, who wants to shine up their fingers with a ring. Dwight Howard could prove he's more than just a big dude who can block shots; he could prove to be a legit leader in this league. By winning, the Magic could add to recent upsets against the purple and gold and be remembered as the ones who stopped Kobe Bryant in his trek. Most of all, they could bring basketball pride to a city without much sports glory.

Picking a winner for this series isn't easy at all. The Lakers have been playing rather inconsistently, with their most recent game being an exception. But then again, the Lakers do have the game's greatest closer in Kobe Bryant. Nonetheless, the Magic do have the momentum, winning round after round as an underdog. The Magic did win both meetings against the Lakers this season. They also found a way to control a team with this year's MVP. Will it be Disneyland or Disneyworld who is the victor in the match-up?

This time, I don't think I'm being biased when I predict that the Los Angeles Lakers will be the 2009 NBA Champions. Regardless of how much the Magic say they have grown throughout these playoffs, it's the Lakers who have learned the(ir) lessons. Last year, after "cakewalking" through the playoffs, as Kobe Bryant put it, the Lakers simply didn't show up in the NBA Finals. From that point on, they have been dubbed "softies" and have been on a mission. They won't settle for second-best. They could care less about being the Western Conference champions. In the last two series, they have banged around with some of the more physical squads in this league and regardless of what the media says, they have gotten much smarter defensively.

At the same time, though, I wouldn't be surprised if the Magic won. Well, I would, but only slightly. The Magic have the game's greatest defender in Dwight and one of the best 2-3 punches (ex. Gasol-Odom) I've seen in Lewis and Turkoglu. Additionally, Rafer Alston had a sensational series against the Cavaliers. With Lebron James' hand in his face, he stayed cool, calm, and collected as he banked a three-pointer. And Skip to My Lou hasn't been the only factor for Orlando. Pietrus has also put on a display of his skills by showing he can drain a long-range deuce just as easily as he can drive to hoop and convert.

But at the end of the day, the Lakers are the wiser, more poised team. They're just so much more lethal. Whether it's Kobe Bryant's scowl or Odom yelling at the top of his lungs, L.A. is just so much more dangerous. With Shannon Brown in the lineup, they have the edge against Rafer Alston. At shooting guard, nobody can stop Kobe. Odom and Ariza should be able to handle Lewis. And I can't wait to watch Gasol and Bynum take on Dwight. This is the crucial match-up here. If Dwight dominates the post, Orlando jurastically increases its chances of winning. But if Gasol and Bynum continue to display a daunting defensive presence, things may turn out to be slightly more difficult.

Posted by Ben on 5/27/2009 10:15:00 PM
Labels: ,



Man, is it refreshing to see Lamar Odom have an influential playoff games -especially in the playoffs, but more so in the Western Conference Finals. Every time #7 has these kinds of performances, it gets me thinking about his maximum potential. But then he goes back to being the invisible but somewhat relevant player he usually is. In a crucial 32 minutes of play, the lanky 6th man scored the most meaningful 19 points of his career, and made sure his defensive presence was felt on each of his four blocks. If there was ever a time for Lamar Odom to step up, it was in Game 5. If there was ever an urge for agression, it was then. If there was ever a game that demanded extra hustle and intangibles, it was then.



Need to see more of this

If you think about it, LO's one of the league's most underrated warriors. Take a moment to think about all the adversity he's overcome in his life. Growing up in a ghetto in Queens, living under his mom (his dad was an alcoholic) until she died when Odom was 12. After receiving a scholarship to play at UNLV, a Sports Illustrated investigation into his grades completely messed up his college plans and forced him to study at Rhode Island U. Then he was taken care of by his grandmother, who died in 2000. In his first few years in the league, he had needed to eliminate his weed addiction or leave the NBA. In '06, when Lamar was chosen to play for Team USA and emotions riding high, everything special in his life seemingly disappeared with the death of his 6-month old son. Now, think of what he's achieved and how much more time he has left in career to really leave his mark.





If the Lake Show can balance their attack like this, maybe those TNT panelists will hush.

We saw bursts of the man's energy earlier in the year when Bynum went down and the Lakers successfully defeated some of the top teams. But when searching for his highlights on Youtube, there actually aren't many emphatic clips of Odom. Besides jawing with Jarret Jack, slapping KG in the butt, and finishing an eloquent lay-up off a nice pass, he doesn't really have his own clips. One of the big things we're still waiting to see from Odom, is his own style. He needs a certain type of jump shot, a special post-up maneuver, a tear-drop - just some trademark move he can turn to once he touches the ball. When he learns how to do this, there, indeed, may be no stopping those looooooooooooooong arms of his.

Another thing we're waiting to see from Lamar is consistency. Can he score more than 10 points - shooting a decent percentage, of course - over consecutive games. Can he block more than two shots each game for the rest of the playoffs? These are all questions that still need to be answered. Every blue moon he decides to give the performance of his career, before humbly setting it aside and resuming his duties as being Lamar. If only we saw him crashing the boards every singly night. If only we saw him knocking down 3-pointers casually ever game. If only he drove to the basket with a heart like no other every time somebody passed him the ball. If only, if only...

Most importantly, though, is Odom finding his niche. This season he took over the job of 6th man, but has proved that he can be very effective as a starter. While whining at the beginning of the season for being the 6th man, he's come around and realized it was for the best interest of the team. It's taken awhile, but this season has been the first full season where we've seen Lamar actually have a meaningful impact on the game. I'm not just saying this in spite of his performance last night - although, I must say, that did inspire me to write this post. Lakers fans may believe that lanky Lamar has basically shown up about once every ten games. However, if you think aboutthe versatility, endurance, and experience he brings to the game every night, we have to reconsider him. It's not every day that we can watch a 6'10" forward handle the ball, hang in there defensively, and shout at the top of the lungs after every highlight.

I'm not saying Odom is going to be a consistent double-double player. I'm declaring that the fact that his lean figure is out on the court has an unprecedented impact on the game - maybe even more so than that of a double-double player. It's time that the media gives this warrior the credit he deserves. And while the Lakers are evaluating every minute he plays right now in determining whether or not they should resign him, I just hope they keep in mind the significant play he can bring every day - whether he's dunking on a 7-footer or hollering for his teammates, he is the Lamar Odom.

Btw, check out yours truly on twitter.

Posted by Ben on 5/26/2009 07:36:00 PM

It takes more than one coin to reach the top...remind you of anything?

One quick order of business: WHO SAW THE MAGIC GO UP 3-1? I can't wait until the Cavs are humbled, voters reconsider their MVP, and the holy members of the media go into hiding for their unjustly endless praise of LBJ and Co.

If you have been watching the Lakers-Nuggets and Cavs-Magic series, you know that there have been several x-factors who have come out of their shells, found cracks in the opponents' strategy, and flat out, saved the game. It seems as though each of the four teams in the championship race - none of whom have a huge edge over the other - have one role player who can really make or break a game, or as we may find out, an entire series. Sure, it always helps when your superstars show up. But your chances of victory get that much better when the other guys follow their niche. After all, Lebron seems to have no problem hoisting 40+ point performances. However, his team isn't getting the job done. Same goes for last year's MVP, Kobe. Without the support of the smaller guys, figuratively speaking, it's very difficult to expect to win.

For the Cleveland Cavaliers, it's imperative that Mo Williams gets his head in the game - and keep his mouth shut afterwards. His victory "guarantee" didn't end up happening and simply added fuel to Orlando's fire. Cleveland appears to be the most desperate team when it comes to an X-factor. I like to call the Cavs "The Lebron Show" because the default game plan seems to be:
1) Bring the ball up
2) Give the ball to Lebron
3) Stand around and hope for the best

The Cavs won't win ball games with that strategy. They need that icing on the cake. Ironically, I suggest that we delegate the dude who can't keep promises (a.k.a. Mo Williams) as their secret weapon. At times, we see this young man flourish as he drains a series of mid-range jumpers, only to score on the next possession by beating his opponent to the bucket. And of course, there is a "bright side" to his "guarantee" comments. It's somewhat refreshing, at least for Cavs fans, to know that their players are confident of their ability. At the same time, though, he needs to keep his ego on the low and just play the game.

Without a doubt, Orlando's game-saver, after Dwight Howard, Rashard Lewis, and Hedo Turkoglu, is Rafer Alston. Skip to My Lou has shown his entire arsenal in this series; the man can shoot, steal, spin, and make a lay-up with ease. With LBJ, runner-up for Defensive Player of the Year, in his face, Alston continued to enforce his will by banking a 3. With Jameer Nelson injured, Alston has done a phenomenal job of handling the ball - and playoff pressure - by prevailing at home and on the road. His outbreak in Game 4 definitely earned him well-earned attention. If he can continue to score, outpace, and outsmart Mo Williams, he can easily guide the Magic past the Cavs.

Denver happens to have the most influential X-factor in the league in J.R. Smith. Sometimes, you could find him hitting consecutive three pointers or beating the opposition on continuous drives to the basket. On other nights, if he were on a boat, he couldn't even throw the ball into the ocean. Every one of his next moves are as irrational as his previous ones. For these reasons, he may never turn out to be an All-Star, but his presence on the game is still huge, nonetheless. Defensively, he's there to keep up with the quick guard on the other team - no matter how successful or unsuccessful he is. Offensively, if he's connecting, he's dangerous; but when he's shooting up bricks, it's almost a guarenteed Denver loss (I'm very reluctant about using the g-word).

Obviously, the player who has the biggest impact on the series (for the Lakers), is Trevor Ariza. Having given up on Lamar Odom and Andrew Bynum, Ariza's hustle has been the difference between winning and losing in 2 games. But then again, his Game 2 slip-up did cost the Lakers a victory. All in all, though, Ariza had provided that extra spark that the Lakers, and more importantly, Kobe, need. When the ball is in the other team's hands, it's as if Trevor is playing with more energy than an offense, and is always looking to add to his stats with a steal, rebound, or block. He can match up with the opposition's shooting guard or small forward rather well, and his well-timed drives and recent increase in shooting accuracy have kept him on the floor (late). If Ariza continues to grab these game-changing steals - and Kobe gets some more help - the Lakers should have no problem advancing to the final round.

Posted by Ben on 5/20/2009 11:44:00 PM


The game sevens in both conferences turned out to be a thrill. The Lakers, victims of the media's unreasonable criticism after being the subject of plenty of playoff compliments, beat the H-Town Rockets in a laugher. Orlando, trying to prove they're a championship-caliber team, also followed suit, and pulled off a victory against the energetic Celtics in a very scary arena. Both teams capitalized on their game seven momentum in the Conference Finals, defeating teams that were favorited to take the series lead. Interestingly enough, neither of the Game 1's were won by more than 2 points.




"He should be arrested for impersonating a good business man"


The Lakers stole Game 1. The tattoo parlor kids practically had the game won. Carmelo was proving most of his doubters wrong - except for the ones that think he's selfish. Sure enough, Chauncey Billups was on his A-game, clinging to his crunch time reputation. But in the end, it was Kobe Bryant, king of the clutch, who came threw yet again. Had the Lakers lost, they would have only fueled the arguments against them that they are "softies" and that they strongly lack a "killer-instinct." Personally, I'm very tired of hearing the word "killer-instinct" - mainly because it's the only reason the Lakers are being legitimately criticized. did impress me though, is how they've fixedmany problems from the Houston series. Pau Gasol is stronger, Fisher is more accurate, and everything seems to be clicking. Denver, on the other hand, must be extremely frustrated with the loss. After leading most of the game, they were outscored 23-14 in the last five minutes. However, I do give them their props, for attacking the post despite lacking a height advantage.

As for Orlando and Cleveland. I'm glad that the media has finally gotten over Lebron and is paying attention to another subject - the Magic. The fact that they were able to rally from 15 points down against this seemingly invincible Cleveland is truly amazing. It's nice to see that the Magic are playing with passion and are trading jabs with the league MVP. For Cavs fans, no biggy, just one loss. Nevertheless, you have to be slightly concerned about this series, since your team is finally being tested. Z against Dwight Howard will prove to be an interesting match-up and may turn out to be one of the keys in winning the series. Let's not foget, though, that this is the biggest test Lebron and the Cavs have faced since running into the Spurs in the '06 NBA Finals.

I also thought I should mention the NBA lottery. As you know, the Los Angeles Clippers, have come away with the first overall pick and have publicly declared they will be selecting Blake Griffin come draft time. But how will he fit into the rotation? We'll have to wait and see. In my opinion, the Clips are already a little stacked at the small forward position, but Griffin should be able to help them. If I were the GM, I may even consider Thabeet to replace Chris Kaman, who missed time due to injury during the past season. Anyway, another exciting player to look forward to is Ricky Rubio. Despite all of the criticism against foreign players, some say he could potentially be the next Steve Nash. But, then again, some said Lamar Odom had "Magic (Johnson) potential" when he came into this league. Emtythebench.com is thinking the Grizzlies might acquire him with their #2 pick, and I think that's a very likely possibility.

Dope Jam of the Day
Good Clothes - Little Brother - Opening with some emphatic horns, this song is the chronicle of shopping and getting by in the "hood". The lyrics basically document Little Brother's obsessions with apparel. He also manages to point out whose "in the wrong", chastising those at the bar for their carelessness. A very good song to play on the way to a party or in some cases, a black tie event. From a production standpoint, I like the combination of trumpets and snares sprinkled with claps. Overall, this somewhat similiar to an earlier recommendation of mine, "Drivin' Down the Block", in the sense that it should fill you up with plenty of pride.

Posted by Ben on 5/14/2009 09:43:00 PM




A great adaptation of enthusiasm of the game's greatest

This isn't the first time we've been faced with a Game 7 this postseason. As we all remember, Beantown's Celtics and Obamaville's Bulls got into an exciting seven game series that didn't fare out well for the underdogs. Now, in the Conference semifinals, we have two seven games series. It's no longer a question of who is the more dominant team; both teams have proved that they are talented. The winner will only advance to the next round by overcoming nervousness and all other emotions in a forum of adversity. But at the end of the day, "there can only be one."

With Orlando and Boston, we've seen the intensity of East Coast warriors. With the ferocious former-T-Wolf in KG absent, the Boston Three Party has turned to their dynamic duo and the bench as their source of inspiration to strive forward. Orlando is still getting acclimated to the heat of the series against the defending champs. I wouldn't call the Magic deers in headlights, but they aren't what I would refer to as "experienced." Coming in as virgins to the fame and success of the playoffs, they have done a phenomenal job holding their own - with the exception of allowing a buzzer beater by Big Baby. They have elevated their skilled players, who got bits of attention here and there, to postseason competitors, who are the subject of praise. The C's will be looking to get a victory on their home floor, but ever since #21 sat out so have the fans. Boston is no longer the most-feared place to play. Not that the waving green towels and roaring fans aren't intimidating; they are no longer a threat to the performance of the opposition. However, Ray Allen and Paul Pierce have the ability to pile up the points in the clutch - crunch time still an issue for the Magic who barely won Game 6 after missing plenty of easy free throws. I'm not going to make any predictions on who will be victorious, but Game 7 of this series should be much closer than the Bulls vs. Celtics Game 7.

Magic's keys to victory:

  • Dwight Howard needs to continue what he's doing - except for publicly criticizing his coach and missing free throws.
  • The X-factors, Courtney Lee and Rafer Alston, must be involved. Lee's jumpshot and Rafer Alston's teardrops and long-distance shooting must be in check.
  • Hedo needs to shoot better and take agressive drives. Despite going 3-13 in Game 6, he scored when it mattered most. The goal will be to finish with a good shooting percentage, though.

The Cetlics keys to victory:

  • Ray Allen and Paul Pierce should be ready for clutch performances, as they were Chicago. Allen's three point accuracy combined with Pierce's mid-range game will likely make-or-break this epic battle.
  • Rondo needs to put defensive pressure on the opposing PG.
  • Perkins and Big Baby need to stay out of foul trouble. As we saw in the 3OT thriller last series, the Celtics desperately need their big men under the six fouls.



Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Coined on an Urban Outfitters tee near you. Just Kidding.

The other seven game series will be the Lakers facing off against the Rockets. The Rockets came in as the underdogs and may actually get much farther than they thought. They stole the first game of the series in Los Angeles, and have reached the playoffs without their star, Tracy McGrady. As if that weren't enough, their center, Yao Ming, the tallest in the NBA, went down in the middle of the series. One would think that would drastically hurt their chances of advancing. Not at all. In fact, you could make a case they've played better without him, going 2-1. However, the Lakers, specifically Kobe, have been cool with shrugging off losses and criticism by winning the following game. Although the Lakers have come out too lackadaisical in this series, they still have a chance to prove naysayers wrong with a Game 7 victory. And some are forgetting the meager bit of adversity the Lakers are playing through. Coming into the series Luke Walton was injured, then we discovered that Fisher was too old to keep up with Brooks, and recently, Lamar Odom, one of the most versatile players the game has, hurt his back. Oh, and I forgot to mention that their superstar-in-training, Andrew Bynum, has only had one decent performance in the series. But at the end of the day, it's difficult to bet against Kobe and his playoff experience, and the Lakers should be able to grind out a victory at home against the Rockets. If this series seems more complicated, it's cause it is.

Rockets' Keys to Victory:

  • Landry needs to duplicate his Game 6 efforts in order to make it close. His 15 points, many of them in the closing quarter, provided the Rockets' with a crucial lift.
  • Scola must exploit Odom and Gasol. When defended by Odom, he has to make sure to take his shots in the paint and aggrivate his back injury. If he's matching up with Gasol, he needs to use the strength he showed in Game 6 to create space with the "softy."
  • Aaron Brooks has to use his speed the entire game - especially when Fisher is on the floor. For the most part, he's run circles around the entire Lakers team.
  • Artest needs to keep his emotions and body in check. An ejection would definitely hurt the outcome of the game for the Rockets. And don't forget, Ron Ron has earned some flagrant points from his ejection. He has one or two more chances before those points result in a suspension.

Lakers' Keys to Victory:

  • Come out with a strong start. They can't afford to let Houston go on a huge run to open the game. As we saw in Game 6, if the deficit in the first quarter wasn't so large they may have had a better chance of winning the game.
  • Farmar needs to play tight D on Brooks. He'll probably have an edge in minutes over Fisher and can't be fatigued.
  • It's crucial that Bynum scores and rebounds. His starting position is in jeopardy and he's not showing any passion on the court.
  • Turn the 6'6" Landry into a liability. His height makes it much easier to match up with him, but you can't let him draw fouls.
  • Gasol can't be weak defensively. His "defense" on Scola was unacceptable. He should also look to lighten the load on Kobe, at least in the first half, so #24 has plenty of stamina in the second half.
  • I'm not worried about Kobe at all. These are the moments he relishes. Another chance to prove himself and his clutch reputation. But he needs time on the floor to do so, and when Jackson rested him at the top of the fourth in Game 6, he really decreased any chances of a Lakers victory.

The hype for these games is immense. Lebron James is probably having goosebumps right now about his next opponent. But he gets one more game in a reclining chair before it's time to play. As for the Nuggets, who have recently been chosen as favorites to beat the Lakers or the Rockets, they'll be anxious for their next battle. But for now, we wait until the result of Game 7.

Dope Jam of the Day

Champagne Red Lights (Remix) - O'Neal McKnight feat. Ron Brownz and Busta Rhymes -In this song, Busta Rhymes, one of the pioneers of New Age rap, spits out our motto, "something like a phenomenon" several times. But that's not what makes the song unique. The chorus has O'Neal McKnight, in a voice resembling an announcer, descriptively reciting the club setting. To compliment the grandness of the chorus, Busta Rhymes literally busts some realistic rhymes. He mentions his amazing presence when he steps in and then its back to the baratone narration of McKnight. And to add a playful sound to the song is auto-tune professor, Ron Brownz. His outgoing personality meshes well with Busta Rhymes' serious nature. In terms of production, the beat is very consistent and has just enough variety to coincide well with the singers. Strongly suggest you listen to this new club anthem.

Posted by Ben on 5/11/2009 10:34:00 PM


In music, the core values, depending on genre, appear to be love, money, and drugs. And while these are popular topics and are responsible for producing countless hits and forming the basis of Billboard 200 albums I'm getting tired of my vocally-talented idols wasting our time with worn-out concepts that can be found in billions of other tunes. I'm tired of hearing R&B ballads about heartbreak, eccentric songs about just dancing, getting the green light, popping or cracking bottles, or smoking. I continually find myself questioning the innovation of today's artists. If I could make a suggestion: try mesmerizing your audience with the world around them.

What I mean to say is, as bands and singers are creating popular culture with their productions, they are undermining it by not recognizing current events and surroundings in their works. Personally, when I think of a cultural song, I immediately hum "We Didn't Start the Fire" by Billy Joel. The entire song is a timeline of the 1950s until sometime around the 80s. Every line refers to a certain year, capturing valuable memories and historic events. If somebody were to skim a 20th century history book and write a song, this is how it would turn out.

Now, I'm not suggesting we do exactly what Billy Joel did. That would be horrible and lazy thing to do. But culture can also take a philanthropic message. "Where is the Love?" by the Black Eyed Peas featuring Justin Timberlake makes a younger demographic aware of future global and social struggles ahead of us. Basically, the song expresses an urgent need for humanity, a message that has become inferior until Al Gore. To hear such thoughts, especially from people in the entertainment industry, is truly refreshing.

2008 also put light on politics and made us realize how much progress we didn't make under Bush. Will.i.am certainly took the initiative of praising our president when he recorded "It's A New Day". Nevertheless, at the same time, he also inspired more optimism in a young audience ready for "change." And I have to congratulate Young Jeezy for rapping about our economic struggles in his album, The Recession. It's remarkable to hear a hood figure educated on the nation's financial woes. What's even more interesting is to devote an entire album to struggles outside of love, specifically when it comes to government and the economy. Hopefully, Jeezy has set a precedent for future singers everywhere - you can rap about money, but make your cash-hungry lyrics meaningful.

However, you could argue that anything besides love, money, and drugs hasn't won over society yet. How many culture-based songs have reached the Billboard Hot 100 or the iTunes Top 100? Well, if you think carefully, Asher Roth's hit single, "I Love College" isn't particularly based on those concepts, although it certainly includes them. The reason why I believe the song has been so successful, is because it paints vivid imagery of a common scene. College parties, a huge part of pop culture, is rightfully recognized and brings light to more than just breaking up with a girl. And even though Asher Roth has been criticized by nearly every person I know (even by my fav basketball blog, FreeDarko, who referred to him as a "gimmick") I began to appreciate him more after I saw his interview with Billboard.




(Some) British bands knew how to compose songs that were about more than just love ballads or illegal substances. As I was shuffling through my iPod, I came across "Revolution" by the Beatles which reminded of me of "Where is the Love?" except with more rage. Another tune that comes to my mind is a bit more philosophical by the Kinks, "This Time Tomorrow". Part of the chorus goes, "This time tomorrow, where will be?" Indeed, the future is a quite intriguing prospect. People don't seem to dwell on this issue too much, but when we think of the future we generally ponder it for a long time before changing subjects. Also, in the same way the song could be a graduation theme it could also be played at a retirement party.

I also believe that music artists should try and be more like visual artists - focus on their habitat. Randy Newman did this very well with "I Love L.A.", creating such a legacy that it is now the anthem of Lakers victories. Tupac also shaked things up with "California Love", which explains the intricacies of this Golden State. And for the East Coast, Frank Sinatra documented his love for New York with the infamous "New York, New York". And more recently, Estelle and Kanye teamed up to produce an international hit with "American Boy." This is one of the more danceable and popular songs about the world's geography and major cities, so kudos to Kanye and Estelle. So, future artists, if it worked for Tupac and Kanye, it will work for you.

Lastly, the main reason I was inspired to write this post was because of "We Made You", the resurgence track of Eminem's career. After coming out of his hiatus, he has hit all pop culture notes with his newest single. Very funny lyrics on Kim Kardashian and Lindsay Lohan, as well as satire when it came to Sarah Palin and a variety of other topics. In addition to making fun of numerous celebrities, Slim Shady has managed to use tabloids to his advantage in making a chart hit.

In conclusion, artists shouldn't entirely forget about common concepts, like lust and clubbing, but rather, also look to pop culture and their surroundings for an inspiration.

Posted by Ben on 5/05/2009 08:26:00 PM
Labels: , ,


I'm very disappointed that my hometime heroes, the Lakers, let the Rockets steal one at our home, but I'm picking L.A. in 6. But at least the horrible green team lost one at home also to the Magic, who have majestically mesmerized fans, analysts, and scholars of the game everywhere. In bigger news, as expected, Lebron James has won the 2009 MVP award. As the great Hubie Brown says, "We know that, OK?!" But, in my opinion, the media and thus, the blogosphere, has failed to analyze more than stats. It seems that with this post, I'll be the first to criticize the MVP balloting process, which has become so sacred in today's SportsCenter Era. Let's take a closer look at some over-hyping that's been going on in society today before tackling the MVP issue.


One of the more common examples of image modification and hype abuse can be seen in Obama. While I am a strong supporter of the President - yes, I give you permission to dub me a Democrat - I honestly believe that the media went overboard on coverage of the Big O. During the campaign, if you were watching any form of news, you probably would have thought that the nation would reach a Messiah when he reached the White House. But it didn't end there. No, the media continued their pursuit of high ratings with plenty of "100 Days" banter. Pundits everywhere were saying one of the following:


1) Obama hasn't really accomplished much in 100 days; the future looks bleak.

2) Obama hasn't really accomplished much in 100 days; that's too short of a time period to judge someone, especially a president.

3) Obama is on track with FDR and Reagan.

What am I getting at? Well, why do we favor certain people in the first place? Usually the answer to that is tied in with the concept of public appeal and image. First off, he's black. Meaning that the best way to exhibit the American principles of equality would be to support a minority candidate and elect him president. Secondly, all the famous rapper and singers were talking about the dude. And I mean all of them. From Jay-Z to Young Jeezy to Will.i.am, there were plenty of songs made about the African-American commander-in-chief. Third, we never really heard anything legitamately bad from his campaign. No dirty attacks or ruthless accusations. Plus, the man was chill. He could care less about what McCain was saying, and focused on "It's about me winning, not him losing" (I basically rephrased Rick Adelman from last night's game. Just replace the "him" with "we"). All of these elements together have changed how we view our president and after having Bush, has redefined "president" altogether. Obama's image is at such a good position right now, late night comics are scowled at when taking a jab at the President or a current administration policy - but the audience doesn't mind wise cracks about the cabinet.


And how do we automatically start disliking people before giving them a chance? Again, when hype had its date with destiny it made sure it was memorable. Tina Fey singlehandedly destroyed Palin's chances of reaching second-fiddle, and by the transitive property, screwing over the McCain's possibilities of becoming president. The media constructed Palin's image as really a female version of Bush. The (vice) presidential campaign this year proved that we are in a period of Media > Truth. It's hard to believe, but a once-a-week comedy show had such a huge political impact on a historic presidential election.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic



I'm a bit suspicious about this year's MVP voting. I understand the need for change. But it's become quite clear that the media has been hyping and favoring Lebron all season. The members of the media - sportswriters and the bunch - are the ones who vote on the award, which clearly explains why Lebron won by such a large margin. Lebron is to the media, as Obama is to Democrats and a majority of the American people - at least on election night. He has the all-around good image. The renowned "Witness" ad campaign. The smile. The shoes. The magazine covers. The stats.

First of all, what is the criteria for MVP? It appears as though this year it was based on individual statistics and team record but here's the truth: While Lebron may have had better individual stats, and his team barely had a better record that the Lakers, he's still in the Eastern Conference. And although the East has gotten much better recently, if you were seeded fifth in the Eastern Conference Playoffs, you still wouldn't have made it to the Western Conference Playoffs. The fact that the Cavs won 1 or 2 more games than the Lakers doesn't mean anything. They played against much worse opponents, which means LBJ had an easier time collecting his own in-game accolades. But if we were really judging MVPs predominantly on ppg and all the other factors, KB24 should have won it the year he scored 81 and averaged 35.4 ppg. These hints all add up to the big conclusion: the media is on Lebron's side.

I was reading some column in the Los Angeles Times this morning - I think it an article by Plashke - and Kobe was referenced to as a "walking scowl." These two words quite literally summarize Kobe's image as he plays the game. They may also serve as a reason why Lebron gets his way. Lebron is that chill, happy Obama-esque character that can commence sparks of joy everywhere. Kobe is the serious, McCain, sticking to fundamentals and staying away from what he believes are naive pitfalls. If they were rappers, Kobe would be Kanye West, "amazing" in every right and always ready to deliver the opponents with some "bad news," and LB23 would be Akon ahead of the game "right na na na." People think Kobe's assistance - Kanye's autotune - has gotten him his new success, while there's a unique, playful feeling in the air as Akon's voice resonates through a party. Conclusion: There's no question Lebron deserved the MVP this year, but the vote should be rationally thought out instead of going with the more popular player.

Dope Jam of the Day
Love Lockdown (1994 Pilotpriest Remix) - Kanye West - The song opens with some cool, snappy percussion which goes along with the upcoming synth notes and bass vibe. This all forms the chill sound and then a froggy voice just comes out of nowhere. The dope part about this mix is its juxtaposition of that froggy voice with a normal sounding dude, along with a chipmunk version of Kanye singing the original track. The occasional b'more breaks give it a party feel. And the sharp, electro squeaks are somewhat of a nuisance until you adjust to them after the first couple of minutes. Beware though, the song ends rather abruptly. Concluion: Wierd song, I know, but it sounds like some strangely-appealing song that would be recommended by FADER or some other avant-garde, Melrose inspiree (I think I just made up my own word).

Posted by Ben on 5/02/2009 03:02:00 PM
Labels: , ,


Media has changed along with the game of basketball itself. As time progresses, technology, as well as level of play and strategy, advances. In the "old days," people usually listened to a game on the radio or saw the game in black & white on TV. Later on, television stabilized as the primary way to watch a game - and for the most part, continues to be that way today. And at the turn of the millennium, the Internet emerged as yet another source of coverage. So I've decided to write about the past, present, and future of sports media - source by source.

Radio: Sports talk shows are among the more fascinating programs out there. Usually the analysts debating on these shows are smart, fresh, funny, and more entertaining than your usual NBA Fastbreak or SportsCenter. But the problem isn't the analysts - it's radio. Even with the emergence of satellite radio, Sirius and XM are fighting against the future. Radio is rapidly vanishing as a source for news (you could argue for music as well, but it applies much more to news and sports). Another problem is the time of these shows, which is usually during the workday or school day of their audience. And since there's no real form of TiVo for radio, a fan can't simply record the program. Conclusion: Unless radio makes a miraculous resurgence, it will only be used to listen to games if a TV isn't available or on the way to a destination.

Print: Print journalism has established too much not to get a mention. Businessmen relish the time of year when the Fortune 500 comes out. Investors desperately await the start of a new year to modify their portfolio according to Forbes investor guide. And culture-lovers everywhere await the month when Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People are revealed. But what about sports? Depending on what you subscribe to, newspapers and magazines are still read today. They serve as a good reiteration of what you see on TV or the internet. However, I still stop and flip through an issue of SLAM on a newstand. Sports Illustrated still has some decent stories. And you can't miss the big, diverse issue of ESPN magazine on a shelf. The problem is not many people care to pay for a magazine when they can read the cover story for free online. I know I still love the feeling of paper in my fingers when I skim through a Lakers column in the Los Angeles Times as I eat my breakfast. Conclusion: Print journalism is dying a slow death, but it has left behind an unsurpassed legacy.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Television: Ultimately, the majority of fans watch games through their TV. This is mostly because there aren't many free ways to watch the game via Internet and radio can only produce so much imagery. For a long period of time the main way to hear an in-depth take on the latest NBA trade was through ESPN or the TNT panel. You could bet that Stephen A. Smith was working up a sweat about a horrible trade or that Charles Barkley and Kenny "the Jet" Smith were praising an off-season acquisition. But that was the past. TV analysis is slowly becoming irrelevant as fans of the game turn to their computers for a potentially more interesting perspective. Don't get me wrong - TV still has former players, coaches, and other personnel that provided great insight into the intricacies of basketball. And most blogs, unless they're blogs of a corporation or newspaper (ex. the Los Angeles Times does have its blog for online Lakers coverage), don't have the valuable access to players, coaches, and team staff - a privilege that the sideline reporters have. In the end, repeated ideas and irrational arguements from somewhat unamusing panels have caused fans to turn to another source for coverage and analysis...

Blogs: We are now in the age of blogs. While I see blogs being more legit in the future, they are a more a part of the present of sports media. Why waste time flipping channels if you think Charles Barkley doesn't know what he's talking about, when you can take 20 seconds to type in the web address of your blog and read a well-researched post? I usually don't give credit to the people over at ESPN, but ESPN.com - I'm praising the website not the TV channel itself - or more specifically, Henry Abbott, has written an impressive display of journalism with TrueHoop. And J.E. Skeets continues to post interesting headlines and episodes with Ball Don't Lie and The Basketball Jones. And the stat-obsessed fan never forgets to check Empty the Bench, which backs up arguements with the right numbers. I know these sites definitely make me feel like I'm interacting with an intelligent fan as opposed to some bald, retired "knucklehead" over at TNT or a biased sports writer at ESPN. And I can't forget about Freedarko, which has served as the sole liason between culture and the sport of basketball. Conclusion: The flaws of television coverage have been fixed with blogs. Plus, Halftime Hype was founded because just like the common blogger, dissatisfaction led to action (by action, I mean starting a blog).

Twitter: It appears as though Twitter will be the next form of coverage in the future. Although I find it somewhat annoying and uninformative, if Twitter expands to something more than just a series of status messages it may be more efficient. NBA players benefit the most from Twitter because as opposed to spending their meager free time hastily writing a care-free blog post, they can jot down what they're doing or thinking. It is a great way for the fan to monitor a player and team without having the media as a middleman. Conclusion: Once the NBA officially sponsors it and more players use it, and the site expands, it could be a unique way for the fan and player to interact.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

So that's basically a round-up of the past, present, and future of media. I chose not to write on the exciting Bulls-Celtics match-up (Go Bulls!) because, well, everybody else had chosen to cover it and I didn't feel the need to shower you with the same news.
Dope Jam of the Day
Daylight - Matt & Kim - This song serves as ode to daylight; it's a rock "banger" for the non-nocturnal party animals who just enjoy the illuminating rays of the sun. The catchy keyboard is probably the best part of the song, as it makes you realize simplicity can be quite serene. The percussion also contributes some livelihood to the song, especially with the well-placed snare hits. I've actually seen this song performed live. It was a pretty amazing, eccentric experience. While the vocals may annoy some, they have that care-free alternative rock swagger that adds to the effect of the song. Conclusion: For all the Southern Californians who enjoy the beautiful "daylight," just take 3 minutes and listen to this tribute to the spirits - you might even like it.